Document Type : Research paper

Authors

• ahmad pasha zanoos
• Farideh Nategh khoshnood roohi ¹
• Abdol Ali alebooye langroodi ²

¹ Amozesh va parwaresh

² Arabic language and literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanity Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Examining syntactic differences among syntax scientists has had special place for a long time. based on that,different schools and religions of syntax have come in to existence and have made the syntax to compete scientifically with each other.Jamal al-Din bin Hisham Ansari(761A.D) is one of the pioneers of Arabicscience who has made a significant contribution to the re searches of syntax and development and revival of this science. His works are full ofsyntactic criticism by great grammarians. and Ibn Osfur A shbili(669A.H) is one of the scholars whose opinions have been criticized by Ibn Hisham. This research is written in a descriptive-analytical way, it examines Ibn Hisham's objections in the book (Mughni‌‌ al-Labib)to Ibn Osfur's syntactical opinions in the book (Al-Muqarab and with Muthul-Muqarab)relying onQur'anicevidence.One of the most important achieve‌ments of this essay is that Ibn Hisham often disagrees with Ibn Osfur's views on syntax issues.The most important of which is the suspension of the verbs of hearts and the removal of one of their two objects,for short and special Arabs in the category ofpraise and dhim, the removal of the inflectional and inflected words against, and the appreciation of the return of the pronoun in the inflectional and usual cases of news.

Keywords: Ibn Hisham-Ibn Osfur-Mughni al-labi-Al Muqarab and with Mothol Muqarab-Qur'anic evidence.

Keywords

• Ibn Hisham
• Ibn Osfur-Mughni al
• labi-Al Muqarab and with Mothol Muqarab
• Qur'
• anic evidence

Main Subjects

• Linguistic research in Arabic